Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rushik P's avatar

I get all this and totally understand Ohtani is a great player and will go down as one of all time greats. As others mentioned dodgers were talented team even if you take him out they would most likely get into playoffs. Who knows his boost in offense was aided by resting and not playing field which you can’t possibly know how much factor that was and quantify.

Lindor was our leader played the one of mosf demanding positions in baseball without him Mets are the Marlins or Nats. Remember 1988 MVP strawberry has the stats obviously not Ohtani level but Gibson won MVP for his leadership he provided dodgers. I think Lindor should be mvp for all those reasons. Just my ou

Expand full comment
Steve B's avatar

I really took my time to read & understand the stats - (WAR & wBOR). There apears to be a lot of dislike for Othhani. Most of it because he was a DH and may win the MVP over our hero Lindor. They havent given out the award yet so we may all be surpised. It doesnt matter that Ohtani was a DH - the guy is a tremendous talent and put up the numbers that JB elaborated on. IMO he is well deserving of the MVP. Due to the fact that leadership - turning arround a sinking ship, and carrying his team to the playoffs that every other Met player looked up to - Lindor would be the choice. Without Ohtani and all the injuries the Dodgers had they dont get to the playoffs. I'm old enough to remember with Keith was a "co-mvp" with Stargel - that could happen to.

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts