Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peter Kauffmann's avatar

I'm still processing the Kumar Rocker debacle and I keep thinking about the famous 1983 NFL draft that included some of the greatest QB's of that era. Dan Marino was a highly touted star who fell to 27 b/c of rumors about his focus. Marino spent the next 15 years destroying the teams that took a pass on him (any Jets fans out there who remember those Ken O'Brien vs. Marino shoot outs?). I really do think the Mets will regret passing on Rocker. I just hope he doesn't end up in the NL East, like Marino vs. the Jets. At the very least, I believe Rocker was worth taking the risk.

Expand full comment
Dallas's avatar

The season all boils down to a healthy DeGrom IMO. With a healthy DeGrom we have as good a shot as anyone in the playoffs and simply have to hold onto our lead. I don't think it was worth gutting more of our system to gamble on DeGroms arm being healthy. If he is healthy having Baez might be that extra thump we need. McNeil can play 4 positions so I'm not sure why fitting him in the final 2 weeks would be hard. Thats part of his immense value, his versatility. Playing him over Dom or Conforto in the OF seems like a pretty big upgrade at this point not to mention having 3B.

There has to be a very serious issue for the Mets to not even offer any money at all. They certainly don't want egg on their face. The fact that they signed Ginn knowing he needed TJS for a good amount of money but wouldnt offer Kumar anything gives you an idea on the thought process. Different owner but largely the same scouts and draft guys right?

The Mets new FO and owner have only been installed for about 9 months. There might be some learning curves happening like having a backup for Kumar not signing but I still think they likely have a solid process going in their other decisions. I certainly don't think any of it is money driven. In the end we as fans don't have all the info and likely never will but too many(check Twitter) act as if they have all the info. With the Wilpons we had many trends and a lot of reporting. Anyone that thinks Cohen is trying to save a couple of bucks after shelling out 361m to Lindor over 11yrs and buying the club for several billions is really out of their mind.

I think there is a really good chance the reason the Mets did not go over the luxury tax this year is that they know for sure they will next year and probably several years in a row by a lot. With both a new CBA happening and repeat offenders having their drafts affected they probably did not want to go over this year unless they had a really compelling reason and Maeda/Donaldson were not enough to justify it. Its also entirely possible Baez money save was to also allow some other move that did not materialize in time.

In the end I think the Mets run under Cohen will make some mistakes but will learn from them and generally make the right decisions most of the time driven by metrics and forward thinking.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts